Ugo: I actually took the lead on the project of writing that. I wrote a much more extensive paper which has been published as well in the Interpreter, the online Mormon journal. It’s about 40 pages long and then from that the Church condensed it down to what is the in Gospel Topics today. Some people will say, well if this is doesn’t say—they wanted to keep it short. There are a lot of footnotes. You can go and read more. You have the full article on the other page. There is another article with me in the other article, a more extensive article, and then we have several geneticists, even known Latter-day saint geneticists that I sent the manuscript, and asked, “what do you think about it?” Forget that you don’t know, or you know about the Book of Mormon, but does the story make sense with the genetic context. Am I presenting genetics and the principles in a fair manner, an honest manner? I incorporated their feedback, and then I submitted that to the Church and that’s what we have today. I was the main guy behind it but it was others, even known LDS geneticists that were involved.
 Other author is Jayne E. Ekins. See http://www.mormoninterpreter.com/is-decrypting-the-genetic-legacy-of-americas-indigenous-populations-key-to-the-historicity-of-the-book-of-mormon/
We’ll also talk about Rodney Meldrum’s claim to have found DNA in Native Americans here in the Americas.
Rod Meldrum honestly, the Heartlanders, the people who promote the Book of Mormon geography in North America, and I don’t have a problem if they like to put the Book of Mormon there but as of today, we have absolutely no genetic evidence of their claims. Fortunately they are hammering that nail DNA continually, saying that DNA is proving their theory, but it is not. They can have other good evidence to support their theory but they should not use today DNA. Maybe down the road there will be some new discoveries that will change how we are interpreting the data today, and we might be saying, oh maybe it was Middle Eastern. Maybe we’re going to find X2A in Jerusalem that we never found before, right? But as of today there is no evidence.
Critics of the Book of Mormon say this is the nail in the coffin. Rod Meldrum says this is the nail in the coffin for his theory. It depends how you look at it. I honestly think that we are far from using DNA in favor or against the Book of Mormon.