Skip to content
  • Give me access to SECRET EPISODES
  • Episodes
  • Watch
  • Listen
  • Subscribe
  • Episodes
  • Watch
  • Listen
  • Subscribe
  • Give me access to SECRET EPISODES
PrevPrevious EpisodeIntro to Documentary Hypothesis (Part 1 of 7)
Next ExpisodeExodus & Israelite Polytheism (Part 3 of 7)Next

Dating Old Testament (Part 2 of 7)

Table of Contents: Dating Old Testament (Part 2 of 7)

Click to Support
Gospel Tangents

A lot of us have heard of biblical terms like Pentateuch, Torah, textual criticism, documentary hypothesis, but we probably don’t understand what they clearly mean.  In our next conversation with Colby Townsend, we’ll define these terms and get more acquainted with Old Testament scholarship.  We will start off with how scholars determined the different authors of the Torah, and dating Old Testament events.

YouTube player

Colby:  So someone like Jean Astruc, actually wasn’t trying to create a new academic method for explaining why Moses didn’t write the Bible or something like that. He was actually somewhat of an apologist as well. He was trying to defend the Bible against the more critical work. So, for him, as he explained himself, the solution for him was to actually take the first part of Genesis, and to separate it into two columns. This is where you get the different sources. So, he started to notice the different use of the Divine Name.

So you have YAHWEH, as I pronounce it, most likely in Hebrew, and you have Elohim. He noticed that in Genesis 1, it is just Elohim. In Genesis 2, at least after verse four and on, it’s just Yahweh. I should note too, that often, in Christian circles, that name is just thrown around as either that pronunciation, similar to that or Jehovah, but it’s a very delicate name within Judaism, Hashem, or Adonai. Hashem is the name, usually what’s most commonly used. Bu Jean Astruc notices that the names are used completely differently. So he separates it into two columns. That’s where you first get the approach, to have what I think what he called was P–well, he didn’t call it that yet. He basically just called it the two…

GT:  It was J for Yahweh or Jehovah.

Colby:  Yes, but, early on, the other one was called E. You’re right. It wasn’t until much later, maybe even Wellhausen in the late 19th century, that it then becomes J and E, but E is no longer Genesis 1, P is.  Then you have J, E, P, D. But it’s a long development to get to the actual documentary hypothesis.

Check out our conversation….

Old Testament scholarship - Dating Old Testament (Part 2 of 7) - Mormon History Podcast
We continue to get acquainted with scholarly terminology of the Old Testament and discuss when it was likely written.

426:  Intro to InIntro to Documentary Hypothesis

 

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 15:49 — 14.6MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Email | RSS | More

Love this? Donate or Subscribe

Do you love the friendly, non-bashing interviews about Mormonism here on Gospel Tangents? 
Please show your support for Gospel Tangents by becoming a donor or subscriber:

Make me a Donor
Make me a Subscriber
No related products found.

More Podcasts with these Guests:

  • Lucy's Dreams, Joseph Sr's Rational Religion (Part 4 of 5)
  • *Reconciling Biblical Scholarship (Part 7 of 7)
  • Adam Clarke’s Impact on Book of Mormon (Part 6 of 7)
  • Joseph Smith & Documentary Hypothesis (Part 5 of 7)
  • Arguments Against Documentary Hypothesis (Part 4 of 7)

Get more information on the people and things discussed in this episode:

  • Guest: Colby Townsend
  • Science Topics Covered: Documentary Hypothesis
  • Historical Mentions Mormon History
  • Tags: bible, biblical criticism, Book of Mormon, Church History, Colby Townsend, Deuteronomy, Documentary Hypothesis, form criticism, Genesis, GT Podcast, historical criticism, iTunes, MHA best thesis, Moses, scholarship, textual criticism, Torah

Tell me when the next episode drops!

PrevPrevious EpisodeIntro to Documentary Hypothesis (Part 1 of 7)
Next ExpisodeExodus & Israelite Polytheism (Part 3 of 7)Next
  • Date: August 5, 2020
  • Guest: Colby Townsend
  • Science Topics Covered: Documentary Hypothesis
  • Historical Mentions Mormon History
  • Tags: bible, biblical criticism, Book of Mormon, Church History, Colby Townsend, Deuteronomy, Documentary Hypothesis, form criticism, Genesis, GT Podcast, historical criticism, iTunes, MHA best thesis, Moses, scholarship, textual criticism, Torah
  • Posted By: RickB

Subscribe

I passed my class! Please help support Gospel Tangents and subscribe to the podcast!

Rick Bennett, Host

Rick Bennett is the friendly host of Gospel Tangents LDS Podcast: The Best Source for Mormon History, Science, and Theology. Book Rick for your fireside or conference.

More Interviews

  • Ben Spackman
  • David Ostler
  • Denver Snuffer
  • Lachlan McKay
  • Lindsay Hansen Park
  • Margaret Toscano
  • Richard Bushman
  • Sally Gordon
  • Terryl Givens
  • Ugo Perego...
View all 100+ Interviewees

Proud to be an Amazon Associate

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Subscribe

Go ad-free, get written transcripts, and talk to Rick one-on-one!
Stop Seeing Ads

Rick Bennett, Host of Gospel Tangents

Rick Bennett is the friendly, independent historian at the heart of Gospel Tangents LDS Podcast: The Best Source for Mormon History, Science, and Theology. When he isn't interviewing Mormon scholars, prophets, and others, he is teaching math and statistics at Utah Valley University. He also freelances as a research biostatistician in the fields of Dermatology and Traumatic Brian Injuries, as well as in the network television/cable T.V. industries as a sports statistician. Rick holds a Master of Statistics Degree from the University of Utah.

Contact Rick
Book Rick for your Event
Podcast Episodes
0 +
People Interviewed
0 +
  • Home
  • About
  • Episodes
  • Subscribe
  • Fan Shop
  • Book Rick
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Episodes
  • Subscribe
  • Fan Shop
  • Book Rick
  • Contact Us
Copyright 2025, Gospel Tangents. All Rights Reserved.